Auto-enrolment thresholds frozen again
Each year, the government reviews the level of earnings at which employers must include their employees in statutory pension schemes. What’s the story for 2022/23?

All employers have to comply with auto-enrolment if they have any employees who meet the criteria (referred to as “workers”). There are a number of important thresholds that govern when employees are entitled to join the scheme. Two of the most important are the earnings trigger and the qualifying earnings band lower limit. The earnings trigger is the point at which an employer must auto-enrol an employee into a qualifying scheme. If the employee earns less than the trigger amount, they can request to be enrolled, and the employer must do so. If they earn less than the lower limit, they can request to be enrolled, but the employer has no obligation to make contributions. The lower limit has been frozen at £6,240 for 2022/23. This means that employees who pay no tax or NI may need to be enrolled if they request it.
The earnings trigger has been frozen at £10,000 for 2022/23. Of course, as the minimum wage rates have increased, this is a decrease in the trigger in real terms. As a result, it’s expected that an additional 17,000 workers will need to be auto-enrolled for 2022/23. There are hefty fines for not adhering to the auto-enrolment rules, so you'd be well advised to identify staff that are just below the trigger this year and prepare to bring them into a qualifying pension scheme.
Related Topics
-
Delay salary to save tax
As a company owner manager, you decide when to take income from your business. If that’s your only source of income, tax planning is relatively simple but it’s trickier if you have other sources. What’s the best strategy to improve tax efficiency?
-
Loan written off: are you in HMRC’s crosshairs?
HMRC is writing to directors that took a loan from their company that was later written off or released. What should you do if you receive a letter?
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?