Could specific gifts from will trust be undone?
The First-tier Tribunal recently considered a case where the way a will trust was administered meant that the distribution of assets was significantly different to the deceased person's intentions. Could the transactions be recharacterised?

Mr Marks (M) was the executor of his father’s estate. The deceased’s will left a number of gifts to his descendants and spouse (as life tenant), and 25% of his estate to charity, with the understanding that this would be more than sufficient to secure the lower 36% inheritance tax (IHT) rate. The problem was that following his death, the trustees of the will trust made a number of gifts to his grandchildren, purportedly as an “advance” on their eventual inheritance - reducing the residuary estate (and the value of the charitable donations). HMRC argued that the charitable contribution was less than 10% of the necessary parts of the estate, and applied the full IHT rate.
The will specified that the gift was to be 25% of the residuary estate, measured at the time of death. This meant that the 10% baseline calculation would be carried out based on the value of the assets held at death, not at the time of making the will. A deed had effectively ring-fenced a considerable portion of the money in the estate for the “specified beneficiaries”.
The grandchildren offered to repay the advances to ensure M’s intentions were met, i.e. a £250,000 legacy to the charity. The judge accepted that the gifts would not have been made had a full understanding of the IHT consequences been made clear, but this did not change the nature of the lifetime gifts and the lower rate did not apply.
This case is a reminder that it is crucial to ensure your intentions are clear when making a will, and that the persons responsible for handling your financial assets understand them. Misunderstandings with charitable bequests can often lead to protracted, and costly, litigation - though that was not the case here.
Related Topics
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?
-
Meaning of “new and unused” clarified for CAs purposes
The guidance on what “new and unused” means for the purposes of first-year allowances has been updated in order to make things clearer. What’s the full story?
-
Scammers already targeting pensioners over winter fuel payments
Phishing attacks are already being sent to pensioners purporting to be from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). What’s going on and how can you avoid becoming a victim?