Criticism of Finance Bill leads to amended basis period transitional rules
From April 2024, sole traders and partners will be taxed based on the profits earned during the tax year, as opposed to the profits for the basis period ending during the tax year. The draft rules were initially criticised, so an amendment has been made. What’s the full story?

To enable the move to tax-year basis periods, the 2023/24 tax year will make use of transitional rules; the profits for the accounting period ending in 2023/24 will be taxed along with the profits up to April 2024 (the “transition component”). As with any major change to taxation, some taxpayers would have been adversely affected during the transitional year. For example, a long accounting period could cause an individual’s income to exceed the threshold for the high-income child benefit charge or the abatement of the personal allowance.
To counteract this, the draft rules sought to exclude the transition component from net income within the tax calculation. However, this unintentionally caused a further issue: due to the order that tax reducers are applied in the calculation, certain reliefs could not be used to reduce the tax due on the transition component.
Following criticism, an amendment has now been made that will allow all income tax reliefs to be applied without increasing the net income. This then allows income tax reliefs including top slicing relief, EIS/SEIS/VCT relief and double taxation relief to reduce the tax on the transition component.
Related Topics
-
Delay salary to save tax
As a company owner manager, you decide when to take income from your business. If that’s your only source of income, tax planning is relatively simple but it’s trickier if you have other sources. What’s the best strategy to improve tax efficiency?
-
Loan written off: are you in HMRC’s crosshairs?
HMRC is writing to directors that took a loan from their company that was later written off or released. What should you do if you receive a letter?
-
Cutting the cost of a company car
You want to help your young son replace the ancient car he currently drives. The plan is for your company to buy it but for the running costs to be met by your son. That’s fine with him but is there a more tax and cost-effective alternative?