The tax pros and cons of benefits vs dividends
As an owner manager of a company, taking income from it in the most tax and NI-efficient way is probably near the top of your list. The general view is that dividends are the best option, but when might benefits in kind trump them?
Profit extraction
Benefits in kind are one of the three main methods for director shareholders to extract income from their company. Except in one situation (see The next step ), benefits are more tax/NI efficient than salary, but generally, though not always, less tax efficient than dividends.
Benefits have an advantage over dividends because a company can provide them to a director even if it is loss making. This makes them a useful alternative or addition to salary in the early years of a company’s trading when it may not have enough profits from which it can pay sufficient dividends to meet a director shareholder’s needs.
When are benefits more tax efficient?
Benefits are more tax efficient than dividends where they are exempt from tax and NI in the hands of the director shareholder (see The next step ). Not only is there no tax for the recipient to pay but the company receives a tax deduction for them. The following tables compare the overall tax positions of a company providing an exempt benefit in kind compared with a dividend of an equal value.
| Company (£) | Director shareholder (£) | |
| Benefit in kind | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Corporation tax (CT) relief at 19% | -190 | |
| Net cost to company | 810 | |
| Net value to director | 1,000 | |
| Dividend | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Minimum director's income tax | -88 | |
| Net cost to company | 1,000 | |
| Net value to director | 912 |
The figures assume the company pays tax at the small profits rate of 19% and the whole dividend is taxed at the dividend basic rate. Both the director shareholder and the company are better off with a benefit in kind rather than a dividend. The tax savings would be even greater where the company pays CT at the main or marginal rate, or the director is a higher or additional rate taxpayer.
When are benefits less tax efficient?
Generally, benefits which are taxable and liable to NI are less tax efficient than a dividend of the same value as the table below shows. However, where special rules apply for working out the taxable benefit resulting in a low taxable amount, e.g. zero or low emissions company cars, a benefit in kind might still edge a dividend for tax efficiency.
| Company (£) | Director shareholder (£) | |
| Benefit in kind | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Class 1A NI (13.8%) | 138 | |
| Corporation tax relief (19% ) | -216 | |
| Director-shareholder’s income tax | -200 | |
| Net cost to company | 922 | |
| Net value to director | 800 | |
| Dividend | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Director's income tax | -88 | |
| Net cost to company | 1,000 | |
| Net value to director | 912 |
Related Topics
-
Updated guidance on mandatory payrolling of benefits in kind
Much like the rollout of mandatory payrolling of benefits in kind, HMRC guidance on the matter is coming in dribs and drabs. What's the latest?
-
Give your children a cheap mortgage
Your son is struggling to get on the property ladder and current mortgage interest rates are making it harder. You’re over the inheritance tax (IHT) threshold but you’re reluctant to give him the money because you’ve heard horror stories about others losing half of it in a divorce. Is a family loan the solution for both of you?
-
Loan Charge settlement offers begin to land
HMRC has begun sending formal settlement offers to individuals and employers with outstanding Loan Charge liabilities, alongside detailed new guidance explaining how offers will be calculated and how long recipients have to respond. What’s the full story?
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.